Users submit feedback, but never hear what happened. How do we fix that?
Open-loop adoption feedbackCreate a visible feedback process with acknowledgment, triage, ownership, and a communicated outcome. Explain whether an item is being fixed, needs clarification, or will not be pursued. Users do not need every suggestion accepted, but they need to know it was considered.
What to do now
- Capture feedback with enough task context
- Triage and assign an accountable owner
- Communicate the decision and expected next step
- Confirm the result with affected users
When to escalate
A recurring blocker remains unowned or users stop reporting issues.
The business process owner and change sponsor
Example
Users see that a confusing approval label was changed and can verify the new wording.
Mistake to avoid
Treating the number of submitted suggestions as evidence of successful engagement.
Prevent a repeat
Measure successful use of the intended workflow and resolve recurring barriers instead of relying only on attendance or logins.
Suggested ApprovedFlow setup
- Tasks
- Documents
- Resources
Assign role-specific readiness and feedback actions, keep reviewed job aids with the project, and record accepted operating responsibilities. See the platform
Related cases
- We launched the system, but staff still use spreadsheets. Why?Unresolved adoption barriers
- Users with accessibility needs cannot complete the new workflow. What do we do?Exclusionary implementation
- Users request a change during training. Should we implement it immediately?Late adoption feedback
- How can we engage users who never attend workshops?Unrepresentative user input