A new executive joins halfway through and challenges the direction. What should we do?

Leadership transition misalignment

Provide a compact evidence-based briefing on objectives, decisions, commitments, and current options. Treat new strategic input seriously while making the consequences of changing direction explicit.

What to do now

  1. Explain the existing decision rationale
  2. Identify the executive's new concerns
  3. Assess strategic and delivery implications
  4. Obtain an authorized continuation or change decision
Recommended action flow for leadership transition misalignment: Explain the existing decision rationale then Identify the executive's new concerns then Assess strategic and delivery implications then Obtain an authorized continuation or change decision. Escalate when the new direction conflicts with existing commitments or governance authority.

When to escalate

Escalate when

The new direction conflicts with existing commitments or governance authority.

Who decides

The stakeholder decision owner and project sponsor

Example

A new executive reviews the business case and chooses a narrower rollout with its costs and effects recorded.

Mistake to avoid

Assuming prior approvals eliminate the need for strategic reassessment.

Prevent a repeat

Check stakeholder understanding at important decisions rather than counting messages sent.

Suggested ApprovedFlow setup

  • Projects
  • Documents
  • Approvals

Keep stakeholder decisions and supporting records with the project and assign follow-up actions to named owners. See the platform

Related cases

Practice references