Our risk estimates are guesses. Can they still be useful?

Weak risk evidence

Use explicit assumptions and ranges while improving the evidence. Qualitative assessment can support a decision, but it should not be dressed up as a precise numerical forecast.

What to do now

  1. Identify the uncertain inputs
  2. Record the basis and limitations of estimates
  3. Gather evidence where it changes decisions
  4. Update assessments after new observations
Recommended action flow for weak risk evidence: Identify the uncertain inputs then Record the basis and limitations of estimates then Gather evidence where it changes decisions then Update assessments after new observations. Escalate when a high-stakes decision depends on unsupported precision.

When to escalate

Escalate when

A high-stakes decision depends on unsupported precision.

Who decides

The accountable risk owner

Example

A team uses low, medium, and high scenarios until supplier reliability data becomes available.

Mistake to avoid

Reporting exact probability percentages invented in a workshop.

Prevent a repeat

Review whether response tasks and trigger conditions remain appropriate as the project changes.

Suggested ApprovedFlow setup

  • Documents
  • Tasks
  • Approvals

Store the risk assessment as a controlled project document and assign response tasks; do not assume a native risk engine is enabled. See the platform

Related cases

Practice references