A sponsor approves scope but not the extra budget. What should we do?
Unfunded change approvalClarify whether the approval is conditional and how the work will be funded or exchanged. Scope approval alone does not create capacity or authorize expenditure beyond existing limits.
What to do now
- Record the approved intent
- Show the funding and capacity gap
- Present exchange, defer, or fund options
- Obtain a complete executable decision
When to escalate
Escalate when
Implementation would exceed authorized spending or compromise required work.
Who decides
The authorized change decision maker
Example
A new report is approved only after a lower-priority deliverable is removed or additional funding is authorized.
Mistake to avoid
Treating approval in principle as full execution authority.
Prevent a repeat
Compare delivered changes with authorized decisions and keep the current baseline distinguishable from earlier versions.
Suggested ApprovedFlow setup
- Documents
- Approvals
- Tasks
Keep the change request, impact assessment and recorded decision together; update affected tasks only after the appropriate authorization. See the platform
Related cases
- The change board is a bottleneck. What should we delegate?Overcentralized change authority
- The change request has no owner after approval. Who is responsible?Unassigned change implementation
- The sponsor is unavailable when we need approval. What should we establish?Unavailable decision authority
- Our contingency budget is being used for extra features. Is that acceptable?Contingency misuse