Our change champions are enthusiastic but overloaded. What should we adjust?
Unfunded change support rolesGive champions a clear scope, realistic time allocation, and access to decision makers. They can support peers and surface issues, but should not become an unpaid substitute for the support team or process owner. Reduce duties that compete with their normal work.
What to do now
- Define the champion's responsibilities
- Agree time allocation with line managers
- Provide an escalation path and support materials
- Review workload and unresolved feedback
When to escalate
Champion responsibilities are harming delivery or their main role.
The business process owner and change sponsor
Example
A department champion receives scheduled office hours instead of answering every issue all day.
Mistake to avoid
Assuming enthusiasm creates unlimited spare capacity.
Prevent a repeat
Measure successful use of the intended workflow and resolve recurring barriers instead of relying only on attendance or logins.
Suggested ApprovedFlow setup
- Tasks
- Documents
- Resources
Assign role-specific readiness and feedback actions, keep reviewed job aids with the project, and record accepted operating responsibilities. See the platform
Related cases
- Our training is in English, but many users work in Arabic. How should we plan it?Language mismatch in adoption support
- The help desk is overwhelmed after launch. What should we examine?Unprepared adoption support demand
- A sponsor approves scope but not the extra budget. What should we do?Unfunded change approval
- A remote stakeholder feels excluded from decisions. How should we adjust?Participation inequality