How do we keep quality evidence usable after handover?
Unusable evidence archiveOrganize evidence around deliverables, versions, and acceptance criteria so a future owner can understand what was verified. Preserve access and context rather than dumping files into an archive.
What to do now
- Link evidence to the relevant deliverable version
- Record test context and result
- Confirm retention and access responsibilities
- Have the receiving owner find and use a sample
When to escalate
Escalate when
Critical evidence cannot be located or interpreted by the receiving team.
Who decides
The acceptance authority and relevant quality owner
Example
Operations can trace an accepted configuration to its test result and approved version.
Mistake to avoid
Archiving filenames without explaining what they prove.
Prevent a repeat
Check that closure evidence proves the agreed outcome instead of relying only on a completion percentage.
Suggested ApprovedFlow setup
- Tasks
- Documents
- Approvals
Attach acceptance criteria and test evidence to the deliverable or task, then record the authorized review decision. See the platform
Related cases
- Can we launch with known defects?Uncontrolled residual quality exposure
- How do we distinguish quality assurance from quality control?Process-versus-output checks
- Our archive contains everything, but nobody can find the final version. What should change?Unusable closure archive
- How do we know a technical project is ready for handover?Incomplete technical transition