How do we evaluate a pilot's benefit honestly?
Pilot attribution limitsCompare outcomes with the pilot's conditions and acknowledge selection, support, and measurement limitations. Avoid generalizing a favorable small trial to every future user or operating context.
What to do now
- Define the pilot's question and baseline
- Record participant and support conditions
- Measure outcomes and unintended effects
- State what the evidence does and does not support
When to escalate
Escalate when
The rollout decision assumes benefits the pilot did not test.
Who decides
The product or business benefit owner
Example
A pilot with expert users prompts a broader test before forecasting benefits for all staff.
Mistake to avoid
Presenting a supported pilot's results as guaranteed organization-wide performance.
Prevent a repeat
Compare observed outcomes with the baseline and separate forecast benefits from benefits actually measured.
Suggested ApprovedFlow setup
- Projects
- Tasks
- Documents
Keep the intended outcome and measurement plan with the project, and assign improvement work to an accountable business owner. See the platform
Related cases
- Several projects claim the same savings. How do we avoid double counting?Duplicate benefit attribution
- How can we measure benefits that appear months after delivery?Delayed benefit realization
- How do we evaluate vendor performance fairly?Inconsistent supplier assessment
- Our change log records decisions but not benefits. What is missing?Change value not tracked