The issue log contains duplicates. How should we clean it up?

Fragmented issue history

Merge duplicates into one authoritative record while preserving links and distinct impacts. Do not merge issues merely because their symptoms sound similar if their causes or resolutions differ.

What to do now

  1. Compare symptoms and affected contexts
  2. Identify the authoritative issue
  3. Link duplicates and preserve evidence
  4. Assign one coordinated resolution plan
Recommended action flow for fragmented issue history: Compare symptoms and affected contexts then Identify the authoritative issue then Link duplicates and preserve evidence then Assign one coordinated resolution plan. Escalate when duplicate ownership is causing conflicting fixes or misleading reporting.

When to escalate

Escalate when

Duplicate ownership is causing conflicting fixes or misleading reporting.

Who decides

The issue owner or delegated decision authority

Example

Several reports of one login failure link to a single investigation while a separate authorization problem remains distinct.

Mistake to avoid

Deleting duplicate reports and losing affected-user evidence.

Prevent a repeat

Track unresolved decision age and verify the outcome before treating an issue as closed.

Suggested ApprovedFlow setup

  • Tasks
  • Documents
  • Approvals

Record the issue and next action on an owned task, attach evidence, and route the unresolved decision to the proper authority. See the platform

Related cases

Practice references